What limitation did the Larry P v. Riles case place on the special education classrooms?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Praxis School Psychology Exam with our comprehensive quiz. Explore flashcards and detailed multiple-choice questions, each complete with hints and explanations. Ready yourself for success!

The Larry P v. Riles case had significant implications for the identification and placement of students in special education, particularly for minority students. The ruling highlighted that minority children were often disproportionately placed in special education programs, which reflected broader systemic issues of bias and discrimination within the testing and placement processes.

The case established that a percentage of minority children placed in special education classrooms could not exceed the percentage found in the general population. This ruling aimed to ensure that minority students were not overrepresented in special education programs simply based on flawed assessment practices or cultural bias inherent in standardized testing. The decision sought to address the inequities in special education placements and promote more equitable practices in school systems.

This focus on equal representation is central to understanding how the educational landscape was shaped post-Larry P v. Riles, impacting policies and practices regarding the education and assessment of minority students in special education settings.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy