What is the key legal obligation established by the Tarasoff case?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Praxis School Psychology Exam with our comprehensive quiz. Explore flashcards and detailed multiple-choice questions, each complete with hints and explanations. Ready yourself for success!

The key legal obligation established by the Tarasoff case is the duty to warn. This landmark ruling emphasizes that mental health professionals have a responsibility to take action when a credible threat of harm to an identifiable victim is made. In the case, a therapist learned that a patient posed a threat to another individual but did not warn the potential victim, which resulted in a tragic outcome. The court ruled that the therapist had a duty to warn the victim, thereby establishing a precedent for the balance between client confidentiality and the need to protect individuals from foreseeable harm. This ruling reinforces the ethical responsibility of mental health professionals to prioritize safety when a potential threat is identified.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy